On Fox News, yesterday morning, Maria Bartiromo interviewed President Trump.  Bartiromo stated that her solid and very reliable medical sources told her Joe Biden has suffered not one, but two brain aneurysms, and she was asking Trump if he could confirm that.  Trump couldn’t or didn’t, but based on how Biden’s clearly deteriorating mental issues, I’d say Bartiromo’s sources are spot on.  Anyone familiar with the HIPAA medical privacy laws knows that divulging the medical information about anyone is a violation and subject to pretty severe sanctions, which explains Trump’s non-response.  But Bartiromo apparently is not, and I suspect she is in a bit of trouble at Fox over it.  We’ll see.

A brain aneurysm can leak or rupture, causing bleeding into the brain (hemorrhagic stroke). Most often a ruptured brain aneurysm occurs in the space between the brain and the thin tissues covering the brain. This type of hemorrhagic stroke is called a subarachnoid hemorrhage.

So based on Pelosi’s sudden push to act on the 25th Amendment to remove a sitting president if incapable of carrying out the duties of a president, I have to agree with some of the pundits and elected officials that her target isn’t Trump, but Biden himself.  In other words, this election isn’t Trump vs Biden, it is Trump vs Harris!  Harris as much as admitted that with her alleged gaffe referring to a Harris-Biden Democrat ticket.

What You Should Know About Cerebral Aneurysms | American Stroke AssociationAdd to that interesting bit of information, my assessment of Fox News turning to the dark side was solidly bolstered when, during the same interview, President Trump criticized Chris Wallace’ performance as Moderator for the debate between Biden and Trump.  Bartiromo stated that Wallace had tried to do a good job and then quickly cut off Trump’s reply by changing the subject.  Everybody who saw that debate knows very well Wallace tried to throw the debate Biden’s way and that Wallace was only stopped because Trump aggressively interrupted Biden and Wallace throughout the event.  That didn’t make Trump particularly likeable, but it did stop Wallace in his tracks.

We don’t need a Debate Commission and never have.  I believe it was created to specifically throw debates one way or the other.  In its current state, the only Republicans on the debate commission are Trump-haters, so what did any of us expect?  They picked a clear Trump-hater in Wallace, and they intended for another Trump-hater, Steve Scully, to throw the next debate before it was canceled.  Who knows who the Debate Commission planned to finish the job with the third debate, but you can be assured it was more of the same.

The debate moderators must be agreed upon by both campaigns and not an alleged unbiased and independent Commission, which it clearly is not.  If there is a solid disagreement between the two campaigns, then they move on to other moderator candidates or they pick one on the flip of a coin.  I don’t care; anything is better than the status quo!

Carl F. Worden

%d bloggers like this: