Quest for more expensive food continues

Killer TomatoBoth houses of the legislature in Connecticut have approved legislation aimed at requiring the labeling of (near-ubiquitous) foodstuffs with genetically modified (GMO) ingredients. The Senate’s version includes an “all jump off together” clause preventing it from going into effect until at least four states have joined in on the idea, which must cumulatively have a population of at least 20 million, and must include at least one state adjacent to Connecticut.  [Greenwich Time, Ron Bailey, related (“food companies should just go ahead and slap labels on everything they sell reporting:

‘This product may contain ingredients derived from safe modern biotechnology.'”)]

Earlier  (NY Times is surprisingly sensible on subject), “[T]here is no reliable evidence that genetically modified foods now on the market pose any risk to consumers,” says an editorial in, of all places, the New York Times. [“Why Label Genetically Engineered Food?“]

And while on the subject of publications outperforming expectations, Slate features a sober look at “cancer clusters,” with George Johnson reviewing a new book on the Toms River, N.J. episode.

%d bloggers like this: