Pelosi’s ‘Doggy-Doo’ Comment ‘Will Come Back to Haunt Her’

If anyone would know about a dish of doggie doo it is PeeLOUSY herself.  This woman is long past due for a mental exam – and I mean YEARS past time.  But that is what consuming the Democrat diet does to a human being.  This Schumer SH_T Down is all on the Democrats as they prefer to violate the LAW on ILLEGALS rather than to ensure that our military gets paid so they can buy groceries for their families and pay the rent.

This DACA issue is nothing more than Democrat CACA and they think a cherry on the top makes it tasty.

I contend (as I have for decades now) that each and every (and I do mean EVERY) politician in office that violates  8 USC Section 1324a states: “Any person who knowingly hires/harbors/transports any illegal alien is guilty of a felony punishable by 10 years jail + $2000 fine per illegal alien + forfeiture of the vehicle or property used to commit the crime”.

This means that all who are pushing for amnesty and HARBORING (Sanctuary areas) ILLEGALS be arrested – charged – and convicted of intentionally violating this law.  Those office holders in California – Gov.- AG – Mayors – etc. are going to be in prison (10 years per Illegal)  for the rest of their lives and own nothing when you apply the PER ILLEGAL ALIEN  charge ($2,000.00 per Illegal).
Why is it that this law is ignored by those who swore an oath to ENFORCE THE LAW?????

Jackie Juntti
WGEN  idzrus@earthlink.net

“The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!”  The Law, 1850.


Rep. Mark Meadows and Sen. James Lankford blast Dems over shutdown gamesmanship as federal officials prepare to close doors

by Brendan Kirby 

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi’s “doggy-doo” description of Republican efforts to fund the government and extend a health program for children to avoid a government shutdown will haunt her for a long time, a conservative congressman predicted Friday.

Pelosi, a California Democrat, made her comment Thursday ahead of a House vote on a GOP proposal to keep the government open for another four weeks. She dismissed Republican efforts to win Democratic votes with a promise to reauthorize the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) for six years. She said Republicans were serving up “doggy-doo” with a cherry on top and calling it a chocolate sundae.

“That is a soundbite that will come back to haunt her, just like, ‘Well, we’ve got to pass it before we understand what is in the bill,'” Rep. Mark Meadows (R-S.C.) said on “The Laura Ingraham Show,” referring to Pelosi’s infamous remark about Obamacare.

Meadows said Pelosi now has voted against health coverage for children three times.

The main issue of contention, of course, has little to do with the popular CHIP program ­ and everything to do with immigration reform and border security. Democrats have decided to use the leverage of a partial government shutdown to win amnesty for young adult illegal immigrants whose parents brought them to the United States as children.

Meadows, head of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, said he supports a legislative solution for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program created by President Barack Obama’s executive order. Many legal scholars believe Obama exceeded his presidential authority under the Constitution in bypassing Congress.

President Donald Trump announced in September he would end DACA on March 5 by withdrawing the Obama order.

But Meadows said it cannot be amnesty without taking steps to prevent the next wave of illegal immigrant children.

“We’ve got to stop the reason for it,” he said. “We’ve got to control the border. We’ve got to make sure that sanctuary cities are not a haven for crime. We’ve got to make sure that chain migration doesn’t mean that we just have an open-border policy.”

Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), appearing separately on “The Laura Ingraham Show,” said Democrats are acting unreasonably. He said negotiations to avoid a shutdown at midnight are difficult to predict.

“It’s hard to be able to tell where they stand on that, because the Democrats have asked for something irrational, and they know it,” he said. “This looks to be their play all along … to try to do a government shutdown over the issue of immigration … That’s a little frustrating to everyone across the entire country when President Trump’s deadline to deal with immigration is not until the first week of March.”

Lankford, who was pushed out of negotiations with Democrats over DACA amnesty, said Trump has been clear about what a deal must include: stronger border security; an end to the diversity visa lottery, which awards about 50,000 green cards a year to applicants chosen randomly from around the world; and reform of family-sponsored immigration that allows new citizens to bring in extended relatives.

Lankford co-sponsored the Solution for Undocumented Children through Careers, Employment, Education, and Defending our Nation (SUCCEED) Act last year. Panned by border hawks, it is similar to Illinois Democratic Sen. Richard Durbin’s Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, but would cover fewer people.

But Lankford told Ingraham that the SUCCEED Act was never meant to stand alone, but was intended as part of a broader package that included other reforms similar to those sought by Trump. He said he has been waiting for Democrats to make a counteroffer.

“And so far, there has not been a proposal back,” he said. “In fact, what was put out by Durbin was simply a restatement of current law. [He] said, ‘We’ll agree to that.’ Well, that’s certainly not acceptable.”

%d bloggers like this: