Bernie Sanders Open to Working with Trump on Capping Credit Card Interest Rates

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) is open to working with President-elect Donald Trump and the incoming administration on capping credit card interest rates.

Trump recently proposed implementing a 10 percent temporary cap on credit card rates.

“While working Americans catch up, we’re going to put a temporary cap on credit card interest rates,” Trump said at a Long Island rally on Sept. 18. “We’re going to cap it at around 10 percent. We can’t let them make 25 and 30 percent.”

The policy would likely require congressional action.

Sanders, who recently secured another term in the upper chamber, said he looks forward to collaborating with the president-elect and his team on limiting credit card interest fees, calling current rates “usury.”

“I look forward to working with the Trump Administration on fulfilling his promise to cap credit card interest rates at 10%,” the senator said in a Nov. 15 post. “We cannot continue to allow big banks to make record profits by ripping off Americans by charging them 25 to 30% interest rates.”

This is not the first time that Sanders has tackled the issue.

In 2019, Sanders teamed up with Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez to unveil a plan to cap credit card rates at 15 percent.

“The reality is that today’s modern-day loan sharks are no longer lurking on street corners breaking kneecaps to collect their payments,” said the Vermont independent at the time. “They wear three-piece suits and work on Wall Street, where they make hundreds of millions in total compensation.”

Bankrate analysts say the decision could benefit half of credit card holders carrying debt from month to month. However, it would impact card issuers’ profit margins “and would almost surely cause substantial cutbacks in access to credit and rewards.”

The banking industry has also opposed previous rate cap proposals.

A spokesperson for the American Bankers Association told The Epoch Times shortly after Trump’s announcement that these measures “would result in the loss of credit for the very consumers who need it most” and push consumers to alternative lending instruments that are less regulated and riskier.

Read More